America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism

Scris de **Admin** Lun Noi 30, 2020 3:34 pm

Reminder - George Soros was Behind Iran Deal

American politics today are defined by two versions of the Jew World Order,

Zionism (nationalism) on the Right and Communism (globalism) on the Left.

The article below is a reminder that George Soros pushed through the Iran nuclear deal much to the consternation of Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump came to his rescue. Trump announced his candidacy in June 2015, just as Iran was being finalized. The only reason Americans got an alternative to Clinton was due to this schism in World Jewry between Communists and Zionists. The Communists, led by George Soros, and fronted by Obama and Clinton, represent the disintegration of the nation-state, including Israel. The nationalists led by Netanyahu and fronted by Trump represents a handful of powerful nation-states dominated by Israel. This is a disagreement between Masonic lodges. In Trump, Americans are getting the crumbs from Israel's table.

Related-[url=https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/03/Jewish-Schism-Over-Trump .html] Hatred of Trump Reflects Century Old Jewish Schism [/url] ----------- (between Trotskyists and Stalinists)

--------------- Soros furious with Trump for killing deal

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism Soros-puppet-Obama

Iran Deal Shows Illuminati/Zionism not Identical from May 25, 2016

The Iran deal was supported by the NGO Ploughshares. "Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros' Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation."

We welcomed the US-Iran nuclear deal last July as a sign that Obama was defying the Zionist lobby.

However, he is always the Illuminati's puppet. As much as Netanyahu and AIPAC protested, we discover the usual suspects (Soros, Rockefeller whom we normally associate with Zionism) actually wanted the Iran deal. The question is why?

Are they leading up to Albert Pike's World War Three that will pit Zionists against Islam and destroy both?

Iran is also controlled by the Illuminati. Do they want to build it up for this final conflagration?

The deal may have been a rain check for Bibi, who has been well compensated for his patience.

Zionism is "but an incident of a far reaching plan," said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917.

"It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon." That weapon is a trauma brainwashed people - army, airforce, nuclear arsenal and secret service, not to mention electorate- at the service of the Illuminati's satanic world dictatorship i.e. Communism.

This article shows how the Illuminati purchase "public opinion."

Related -- Israeli-engineered nuclear war between the US and Russia-How the World Ends

The Soros-Backed Group that Helped Sell Iran Nuclear Deal

Breitbart.com

(abridged by henrymakow.com)

TEL AVIV - A group that advocates a nuclear-free world and that was identified earlier this month by the White House as central in helping to market the Iran nuclear deal to the news media has funded National Public Radio since 2005, an Associated Press investigation has revealed.

Think tanks funded by the Ploughshares Fund include the Arms Control Association, Brookings Institution, and the Atlantic Council, the AP reported.

Unmentioned by the AP is that the Ploughshares Fund is financed by billionaire George Soros' Open Society Institute.

America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism Rhodes

The involvement of Ploughshares in selling the Iran agreement to the public was revealed in an extensive New York Times Magazine profile of Obama's deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, left, titled, "The Aspiring Novelist Who Became Obama's Foreign-Policy Guru." The article contains interviews with Rhodes and scores of top Obama administration officials...

In the spring of last year, legions of arms-control experts began popping up at think tanks and on social media, and then became key sources for hundreds of often-clueless reporters. "We created an echo chamber," he admitted, when I asked him to explain the onslaught of freshly minted experts cheerleading for the deal. "They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say."

Rhodes told Times reporter David Samuels that the marketing strategy took advantage of the "absence of rational discourse" and utilized outside groups, including Ploughshares.

When I suggested that all this dark metafictional play seemed a bit removed from rational debate over America's future role in the world, Rhodes nodded. "In the absence of rational discourse, we are going to discourse the [expletive] out of this," he said. "We had test drives to know who was going to be able to carry our message effectively, and how to use outside groups likePloughshares, the Iran Project and whomever else. So we knew the tactics that worked." He is proud of the way he sold the Iran deal. "We drove them crazy," he said of the deal's opponents.

(CENTRAL BANKER) MONEY TALKS

Now the AP has revealed the extent of Ploughshares funding to NPR and to influential foreign policy U.S. think tanks.Besides $100,000 to NPR last year, the AP reports:

Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005, the radio network said. Ploughshares reports show at least $700,000 in funding over that time. All grant descriptions since 2010 specifically mention Iran.

"It's a valued partnership, without any conditions from Ploughshares on our specific reporting, beyond the broad issues of national and nuclear security, nuclear policy, and nonproliferation," NPR said in an emailed statement. "As with all support received, we have a rigorous editorial firewall process in place to ensure our coverage is independent and is not influenced by funders or special interests..."

The Arms Control Association got $282,500; the Brookings Institution, $225,000; and the Atlantic Council, $182,500. They received money for Iran-related analysis, briefings and media outreach, and non-Iran nuclear work.

Other groups, less directly defined by their independent nuclear expertise, also secured grants.

America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism Illuminati8

J-Street, the liberal Jewish political action group, received $576,500 to advocate for the deal.More than $281,000 went to the National Iranian American Council.

Princeton University got $70,000 to support former Iranian ambassador and nuclear spokesman Seyed Hossein Mousavian's "analysis, publications and policymaker engagement on the range of elements involved with the negotiated settlement of Iran's nuclear program."

Ploughshares says it has awarded hundreds of grants "whose aggregate value exceeded $60 million."

A previous investigation by this reporter showed Ploughshares has partnered with a who's who of the radical left, including Code Pink, the pro-Palestinian J Street, United for Peace & Justice, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Demo, a progressive economic advisory group where President Obama's controversial former green jobs czar, Van Jones, has served on the board.

The group says its mission is to support the "smartest minds and most effective organizations to reduce nuclear stockpiles, prevent new nuclear states, and increase global security."

Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros' Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Another Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, which is one of the largest funders of the radical left. Tides is funded by Soros.

Ploughshares has donated to the Institute for Policy Studies, which calls for massive slashes in the U.S. defense budget.

It has also financed the International Crisis Group, a small organization that boasts Soros on its board.

---------

First Comment by Tony B

Going a little deeper into this change in tactic, which is all it is:

There have been signs lately that the rabid Israeli leadership has outlived its usefulness to the Rothschild cabal plus everyone who matters knows that it is a directly subservient subdivision of Rothschild, Inc. which makes it a liability to that cabal.

In today's world that City of London headquartered cabal has one objective above all others which is the conquest of Russia's vast, practically untouched, natural resources, perhaps the last big prize left in the world. They thought they had already stolen it through the communist destruction but have been shocked at the rapid return of Christianity and its right order after they dropped the terrorist tyranny and began their systematic rape of its resources. Not to mention that the cabal thought it had Russia's fuel in hand until Putin thwarted them by jailing their agent and returning that industry and its resources to the Russian government.

So long as Zionist Israhell exists Iran will remain "hard nosed" against it and the supporting "West." But with Israhell reduced by the cabal to be no longer a power which can play the Middle East as it pleases, Iran will eventually mellow, let its guard down, allowing the multitude of Rothschild funded (that means Soros et al too) organizations to infiltrate it and establish themselves as a weapon pointed at the soft under belly of Russia, a necessity for the total surrounding of that vast nation.

They know Putin will not live forever and they have every intention of getting their prostitute, Medvedev (or any number of others), back in the top spot in time to further weaken Russia's defenses against the Rothschild financial empire which can buy many to so help them, can order conquest by whatever owned proxy it chooses, and can then once again destroy that nation and steal its resources.

Scris de **Admin** Lun Noi 30, 2020 3:48 pm

Attack In Nice Committed By French National

July 15, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - Thursday evening as scores of people celebrated the 14th of July in Nice, France, a truck driver swerved into the crowd. At least 84 people were killed as a result and many more were injured. While certain political figures were quick to jump on blaming foreigners and refugees, the attacker was identified by local media as a French national.

After attacks in Paris, Brussels, San Bernardino, and Orlando, many political figures have used the opportunity to turn on refugees. But in each of these instances the attacker or attackers were often locals.

In the attacks in Paris in November 2015, police identified Salah Abdeslam, Brahim Abdeslam, Omar Ismail Mostefai, Chakib Akrouh, Abdelhamid Abaaoud, Samy Amimour, Foued Mohamed-Aggad, and Bilal Hadfi. All these men were French or Belgian citizens and were born in one of the two countries. While some of them are thought to have radicalized and then subsequently traveled to Syria, all had spent the majority of their lives in Europe.

Brussels attackers Ibrahim and Khalid El-Bakraoui and Najim Laachraoui were also European nationals. Laachraoui was born in Morocco but raised in Brussels while the El-Bakraoui brothers were Brussels born and raised.

San Bernardino attacker Syed Rizwan Farook was born in Chicago and lived and worked in San Bernardino as an environmental health specialist. His co-conspirator and wife, Tashfeen Malik, was not an American citizen but entered legally on a K1 visa for fiancees of U.S. citizens in July 2014 — more than a year before the attack.

In Orlando, the attacker was New York-born and Florida resident Omar Mateen.

Blaming refugees for terrorism is not only setting a dangerous precedent for some of the world's most vulnerable people, but it is also factually incorrect.

"It is factually wrong for blaming refugees for the very terror they are fleeing, and it is legally wrong because it violates our laws and the values on which our country was founded,” Cecillia Wang, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said.

The attacker in Nice was a French-Tunisian dual national who lived in Nice and was identified by local media as 31-year-old Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel. In fact, the attackers in November's Paris attack and the subsequent one in Brussels were all citizens of France or Belgium.

To date, no refugees have been identified in any of the attacks in Europe and not a single refugee has been arrested in the United States for domestic terrorism since 9/11.

"The real problem here isn't refugees or migrants," Vox reported in March. "There's no reason to believe that refugees or foreigners are the source of these terrorist attacks, so keeping them out won't prevent further attacks. And even if fighters returning from Syria are a potential source of danger, they're citizens — even the most stringent immigration controls wouldn't keep them out."

@2005-2016 CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND

France reels as attack leaves 84 dead in Nice: A large truck plowed through revelers gathered for Bastille Day fireworks in Nice, killing at least 84 people and sending others fleeing into the sea as it bore down for more than a mile along the Riviera city's famed waterfront promenade.

Why so many children were injured in the Nice attack: More than 50 children were injured by the suspected terrorist attack, and French officials said that more than 10 of the 84 dead were children too.

Pictured: Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel who was gunned down by police in the vehicle he used to kill 84 people: ID card belonging to Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, a French Tunisian man, 31, from Nice, found next to his body

What we know about Nice suspect: Father of 3, solitary & not very religious : The neighbors described the attacker to Nice Matin newspaper as a solitary figure who even didn’t return greetings when their paths crossed.

Terrorism: the 'new normal' for today's traveller: I've been to Nice. Paris and Brussels, too. Chances are you probably have as well. A bomb goes off in Baghdad, killing hundreds, as was the case the other day, and it hardly hits the homepage.

Newt Gingrich's Response to Nice Terror Attack: Rip Up the Constitution: "Western civilization is at war," adding, "We should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background, and if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported. Sharia is incompatible with Western civilization."

Č

đ

ADD FILES