The Hanukka Story–Checking our Motivation

Jews in the Diaspora deal with this question every day; it goes to the essence of their identities.

ed note–again, a typically Judaic piece–twisting, winding, verbose, oftentimes confusing and convoluted–but nevertheless very important to read and consider when framing the ‘bigger picture’ in our minds as to the drama we see taking place today on the world stage.

As our esteemed Hebraic author makes very clear, Judaism (along with all its attending characteristics) is what has acted as an allergen and as an irritant throughout the tumultuous history of its various interactions with Gentile societies. ‘Anti-Shemitism’–as the misnomer has been used now in shooing away any real, logical, substantive discussion of what the root causes of Judaic/Gentile friction has been over the millenia–is nothing more than the same predictable, inevitable, natural reaction that takes place when someone has black pepper blown into their face that results in their sneezing. Socially and culturally speaking, it is the autonomic/auto-immune response on the part of Gentiles and their various societies–going all the way back to the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Persians, Babylonians, etc,  and all the way forward to today–to what is the ‘corrosive force’ of Judaism,as was once famously described by Jewish writer Douglass Rushkof.

The problem is that once a person suffers any kind of intimate and prolonged contact with Judaism, it sticks to them like super glue. The psychological branding that takes place on the part of those unfortunate souls who find themselves immersed in it before they have even become potty trained is something that leaves scars for the entirety of a person’s life. Try as they might to shake it off, nevertheless, the various psychological handicaps that attend any substantive exposure to this highly toxic spiritual substance is such that if a person does manage to declare their independence from the mental prison of the Ghetto, they go through life in Gentile societies with (psychologically speaking) a pronounced limp, lisp and in many respects are as lame and psychologically crippled as someone who contracted Polio.

And it is within these parameters that our understanding of Hanukka must take place. Try as they do to paint it as a celebration of independence, freedom, and all the rest, the ugly truth of the matter is that this event is nothing more than the Jews celebrating their own enslavement and the victory of those religious terrorists of the past in preventing the mental illness known as Jtosis from being cured and eradicated. The entire history of the last 2,500 years, beginning with the Judaic rejection of the more enlightened and progressive Hellenic (Greek) culture, moving forward with the arrival (and subsequent Judaic rejection) of the enlightened teachings of one Jesus of Nazareth, culminating in the war between Judea and Rome that then resulted in the physical destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering to the 4 winds of the Jewish people is nothing more than a testimony to manner by which the Judaic mindset has refused to evolve and to detoxify itself of the very same backwards, barbaric, and abrasive ‘qualities’ that have made it the ‘corrosive  force’ throughout history that it has been.

Hadassah Fidler, Jpost

The Hanukka story, the one we learn as children, tells of the heroism of the Jews who, led by the Maccabees, stood up to the Antiochus the wicked Greek king who wished to destroy all spiritual traces of Judaism. It is about a light that should have lasted one night but lasted eight. Yet as we learn more about the Hanukka story we can see that it is multifaceted. The main message of the story does center on preserving Jewish independence, freedom and identity, but the story also contains politics and infighting and divisions within the Jewish community.

At the time of the Maccabees, Israel was in the midst of a continuing struggle between the Seleucids (ancient Greek Hellenist empire) and the Ptolemies (ancient Egyptian Hellenic empire). The Greeks were looking to consolidate and strengthen their borders. When Antioch IV came to power he instituted a number of laws banning central Jewish practices. It appears that the Greek political agenda was to absorb the Jews into the empire and forcibly align their values and identities with Greek culture. If the citizens of Israel identified as Greeks they would be far more likely to be loyal to “their nation” Greece then if they were simply subjects of a far-off empire.

There were Jews who subscribed to this thinking, and the fight between the Hellenist Jews and the Maccabees was fierce. The Hellenistic Jews sided with the Greeks and were furious with the Maccabees and their followers for stirring up trouble and proclaiming their anger at the anti-religious laws.

At one point Alcimus, who was the Jewish Hellenist high priest, went to Demetrius the Seleucid (Greek) king to ask for intervention to help fight the Maccabees. This, in turn, caused a whole new round of fighting.

It is an issue Jews have had to deal with in every generation; the concept of loyalty to their religion or to the state. Jewish citizens have often been suspect, with critics arguing that their allegiance to religion comes first. Is a French Jew a Frenchman first or a Jew first? The Dreyfus trial was an exercise in looking into this concept.

The whole question becomes murkier for Jews around the world when the issue of Israel is raised. If there was a war, which side would you take? The expulsion of the Jews from Muslim countries when the State of Israel was declared was a clear directive from those countries of how they viewed Jewish dual loyalty.

Jews in the Diaspora deal with this question every day; it goes to the essence of their identities. The psychological effect on the Jewish people is profound; some turn deeper into Jewish practice and beliefs, while others try to assimilate completely to prove their loyalty. The line is not black and white but covers a huge gray area.

In Germany, from 1921 to 1935, the Association of German National Jews was led by a man named Max Naumann. According to the historian Robert S. Wistrich, the association’s aim was “the total assimilation of Jews into the German Volksgemeinschaft, self-eradication of Jewish identity, and the expulsion from Germany of the Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe.” Until its dissolution by the Nazi government in 1935 it supported Hitler and campaigned against the Jewish boycott of German goods.

Today, with the benefit of hindsight our judgment may be harsh, and yet we still see Jews fighting against Jewish interests in the name of human rights and liberal agendas.

When Jews support the boycott of Israel and delegitimize its existence, and Jewish scholars sign a petition protesting a US president’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, when organizations such as B’Tselem spread hatred of the institutions of the State of Israel, we are facing Hellenization, an attempt to suborn our Jewish identities to another culture. This is not about legitimate criticism of Israel, which can even be essential to a democratic state, but about checking the motivation behind such criticism.

When the motivation behind Jewish anti-Jewish/Israel criticism is that the critics are uncomfortable with part of their Jewish identity and wish to be accepted by others, something goes askew. We are used to hearing that we should “check our privilege,” but perhaps as Jews when criticizing others we should check our motivation.

The fight is old and tired and yet it goes on. A fight to tell ourselves and others that it is OK to be Jewish, it is OK to stand up for Jewish people and the State of Israel. That fighting against each other is not the answer to gain acceptance from others. The Maccabees fought for Jewish identity not to be subsumed by the Greeks and their culture. As we light the hanukkia this Hanukka, and the lights glow from one window to the next, let’s take it as a message from one Jew to the next to take strength from one another and take pride in our identity as Jews.